Out-Law Analysis 5 min. read
03 Aug 2022, 2:10 pm
Financial services firms should consider the carbon emissions associated with the technology services supplied to them when forming objectives around environmental, social and governance (ESG) reporting.
Firms that work with their technology providers to increase transparency over, and ultimately tackle, emissions associated with storing data, using software and technology waste will be better able to demonstrate their actions on combating climate change and resist growing climate-related scrutiny that can threaten their reputation.
A growing number of financial services firms active in the UK must comply with the Financial Conduct Authority’s (FCA) environmental disclosure requirements. These implement otherwise voluntary global reporting standards created by the Task Force on Climate-related Financial Disclosures (TCFD).
Luke Scanlon
Head of Fintech Propositions
Firms that work with their technology providers to increase transparency over, and ultimately tackle, emissions will be better able to demonstrate their actions on combating climate change and resist growing climate-related scrutiny
The FCA’s reporting obligations came into effect in December 2021 and apply to accounting periods beginning on or after 1 January 2022. Therefore, we can expect to see the first reports addressing the FCA’s new requirements to be published in early 2023.
The FCA’s requirements apply to:
Asset managers and asset owners with less than £5 billion in assets under their management or administration, calculated on a three year rolling average, will not be subject to the FCA’s requirements until 1 January 2023.
As part of its net zero strategy, the UK government introduced reporting requirements which are similar to those of the FCA. These apply to UK registered companies and LLPs with a turnover in excess of £500m and more than 500 employees, as well as all publicly quoted UK companies.
In its explanatory guidance, the UK government addressed the fact that there is now an overlap between its new requirements and the FCA’s, which means that some UK companies with more than 500 employees will now be subject to both regimes. The government stated that reporting which complies with all of the TCFD’s requirements is “normally likely” to meet the requirements of both the UK government and the FCA regime. The government’s reporting requirements apply for accounting periods beginning on or after 6 April 2022.
A common theme across the FCA and UK government’s regimes is expectations around reporting on carbon emissions. Recent international trends in reporting on carbon emissions have identified three broad areas, or ‘scopes’, in which financial services firms are now be expected to make disclosures:
Whilst reporting on scope 1 and 2 emissions is mandatory under the FCA and UK government’s regimes, reporting on scope 3 emissions is not, though there is one small exception on business-related travel for companies which are not listed on the stock exchange. However, there is growing attention in the media in relation to voluntary scope 3 reporting and financial services firms should consider the potential reputation damage of failing to report on these.
As scope 3 emissions come from sources which firms do not control or own, they must liaise with their suppliers to evaluate what emissions are relevant for disclosure and how they might address them. This process should involve:
Given the ever-increasing use of technology in the sector, a large portion of the scope 3 reporting for financial services firms will be made up of carbon emissions from technology providers. There are several important areas which firms should consider in particular:
While reporting on scope 3 emissions is not currently a regulatory requirement for financial services firms, there is growing expectation in the market that firms will do so.
Increased reliance on technology has led to an increase in carbon emissions in supply chains and firms should ensure that sustainability objectives are reflected in arrangements with suppliers, including through contractual provisions, to effectively mitigate their impact on the environment.
Co-written by Michael Livingston of Pinsent Masons.
Out-Law Analysis
23 Jun 2022