The Professional Contractors Group (PCG), which was formed to campaign against the IR35 tax is arguing that the tax should be lifted. It says IR35 means that many small companies, mainly in IT and engineering, are unable to operate on equal terms with their larger competitors since their turnover is treated as salary for tax and National Insurance Contribution (NIC) purposes. They are therefore, says the PCG, unable to make or retain profits, unable to allow business expenses such as training and equipment against tax and cannot invest for the future or plan to grow or develop.
Last week, the judge hearing the case suggested that a consultant working on a contract for a company could be deemed to be an employee and entitled to company benefits. The PCG said even if the judge refused to rule against IR35, entitlement to employee benefits would be a significant concession.
The government argues that IR35 was a necessary introduction to close a loophole that allowed some people to avoid paying tax and NICs by operating through a personal service company.