Financial services regulation expert Elizabeth Budd of Pinsent Masons, the law firm behind Out-Law, said the consultation followed recent action by the FCA to ban the sale of ‘mini bonds’ and the mass-marketing of speculative illiquid securities to retail investors.
“It illustrates the concern that because any authorised firm can approve any financial promotion for an unauthorised person, the authorised firm may either not undertake proper due diligence and verification when approving a financial promotion for a third party, or may not have the necessary expertise to understand the investment and its associated risks,” Budd said.
“The two options proposed – the FCA consent gateway or a new regulated activity of approving financial promotions – are discussed at high level and it appears that the consent option is the preferred option,” Budd said.
“What is not clear is how the FCA will assess that a firm should be granted consent and how investments are to be categorised. Clearly we already have the concepts of complex and non-complex products and we also have non-mainstream pooled investments and soon, systemically illiquid securities. It would not be surprising if the FCA used these terms in its consent process,” Budd said.
Budd said the proposals in the latest consultation left a gap in the approval process, as the new regime would not apply to an authorised firm that approves a financial promotion on behalf of a company in its own group.
Separately, the Treasury is also consulting on proposals (27 page / 246KB PDF) to bring the promotion of certain types of cryptoassets within the scope of financial promotions regulation. The measure is intended to enhance consumer protection, while continuing to promote responsible innovation.